Just finished reading “Man’s Search For Meaning” by Viktor E. Frankl and it was pretty interesting.

One because based on the title, I thought it may have been about someone going on a journey to “Find Meaning of his life” (kinda like the Alchemist), but it wasn’t that.

Viktor was actually a prisoner in the concentration camps of Nazi Germany during WWII and lost his wife, father, mother, and brother there.

Yet through all of the horrors he witnessed and the physical and mental suffering he endured, he was able to survive because of what he calls “the will to meaning.”

In the book, he talks about his experiences there, and how we was able to use his theories – called logotherapy – to stay alive when most people were not.

Here’s what Logotherapy was all about:

Essentially, the idea is that striving to find personal meaning in life is the most motivating and driving force in a person’s life.

The three basic principles of Logotherapy are:

– Freedom of Will: Life has meaning under all circumstances, even the most miserable ones.

– Will to Meaning: Our main motivation for living is our will to find meaning in life.

– Meaning of Life: We have the freedom to find meaning in what we do, and what we experience, or at least in the stance, we take when faced with a situation of unchangeable suffering.

Ways of Finding Meaning

According to Viktor, people discover meaning in life in three different ways:

Work: by creating a work or accomplishing a task.

Love: by experiencing something in life or encountering someone, through the quality of love.

Attitude: by the attitude we take toward unavoidable suffering” and that “everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances.

Viktor gives an example in the book that illustrates his point perfectly:

“Once, an elderly general practitioner consulted me because of his severe depression. He could not overcome the loss of his wife who had died two years before and whom he had loved above all else. Now how could I help him? What should I tell him?

I refrained from telling him anything, but instead confronted him with a question, “What would have happened, Doctor, if you had died first, and your wife would have had to survive without you?:”

“Oh,” he said, “for her, this would have been terrible; how she would have suffered!”

Whereupon I replied, “You see, Doctor, such a suffering has been spared her, and it is you who have spared her this suffering; but now, you have to pay for it by surviving and mourning her.”

He said no word but shook my hand and calmly left the office.”

Here’s how Viktor applied his own theories to survive the suffering he endured in the concentration camps of Nazi Germany.

Suffering and The Human Body

One of the things that struck me most about Frankl’s retelling of his experiences is his reflection on how tough and adaptable the human body actually is.

Upon entering the concentration camps, the prisoners were stripped of almost everything they held onto in their previous lives immediately.

Most of the people who had arrived at the camps did not make it past the first day. Those who looked sick or unfit for work were sent directly to the gas chambers.

Those who survived the first round of selections were about to find out what the human body and mind were capable of.

They were separated from their families, stripped and shaved from head to toe, and any possessions they brought with them were taken from them. Then they were given a number which they had tattooed on their body.

Once they were in the camps they started to learn that much of what they thought they knew about the human body was not correct.

Here, Viktor talks about some of the punishment they had to endure:

“We were unable to clean our teeth, and yet, in spite of that and a severe vitamin deficiency, we had healthier gums than ever before.

We had to wear the same shirts for half a year until they had lost all appearance of being shirts.

For days we were unable to wash, even partially, because of frozen water pipes, and yet the sores and abrasions on hands which were dirty from work in the soil did not suppurate (that is, unless there was frostbite).”

He then goes on to talk about how they were forced to live on very little sleep, very little food (a piece of bread and small portions of watery soup were all they got to eat), and work insanely hard day after day, week after week, and for those who were able to find meaning in this unimaginable suffering, year after year.

Not to mention the mental suffering that was inflicted upon them.

They walked around knowing that if they started to let their physical suffering show, they would be taken to the gas chamber to be put out of their misery. They knew that because they saw it happen daily.

And yet, somehow, many of the people in the camps lived to discuss the experience.

Viktor found that those that survived the experience somehow used the power of their minds to find meaning in the experience. If they held on to that, no matter how harsh and brutal the experience became, they could survive.

He tells a powerful story of how they knew that somebody had given up the will to live, and how they knew that, in quick order, that person would die.

If you were an exemplary worker, you would sometimes be given a reward of cigarettes. The cigarettes became a form of currency in the camps.

You could trade in your cigarettes for extra servings of soup or bread. And so, if you still had the will to live, that’s what you would do.

Little extra calories went a long way in making you stronger and more fit for work, and thus, helping you stay alive.

Those who had given up would smoke their cigarettes. And so, they knew that when they saw a fellow prisoner smoking, it wouldn’t be long before they were gone.

What allowed Frankl and many other prisoners survive was the will to live.

Here are the three different meanings of Logotherapy, and how Viktor used them all to survive.


One of the things that Frankl did during his time in the concentration camps was to rewrite a manuscript that was confiscated from him upon his entry.

He mostly had to keep his ideas alive in his head because there was no way the Nazi’s would allow him to rewrite it in full. The would simply confiscate it again and likely put him to death.

He was able to write portions of it out on scraps of paper he kept hidden and often imagined himself giving lectures about logotherapy and how he used those principles to survive the camps.

Even though his current circumstances didn’t offer him any hope of ever seeing beyond the barbed wire fences surrounding the camp, he found true meaning in the suffering he endured.

He knew that logotherapy would have the ability to help thousands or even millions of people around the world overcome challenges in their lives, and he needed to survive to tell his story.

This was really powerful. Seeing how this suffering was meant for him to come out and share with others.


One day, as Viktor was marching along with his fellow prisoners to their work site for the day, the person beside him whispered in his ear:

“If our wives could see us now! I do hope they are better off in their camps and don’t know what is happening to us.”

That led Frankl to think of his own wife, and also to contemplate that love is the ultimate and highest goal to which man can aspire.

In the book he says the following:

“Then I grasped the meaning of the greatest secret that human poetry and human thought and belief have to impart: The salvation of man is through love and in love. I understand how a man who has nothing left in this world still may know bliss, be it only for a brief moment, in the contemplation of his beloved.”

Love, for Viktor, was the ultimate antidote to pain. We’ll explore in the next section the idea that, no matter how harsh our circumstances, we have the ability to choose our response to it.

(read that last sentence again)

Responding to punishment with thoughts of love was for him the ultimate coat of armor.

Keep in mind that it wasn’t the hope that his wife was alive that kept him going – it was recalling the love he felt for her.

He explains:

“I did not know whether my wife was alive, and I had no means of finding out (during all my prison life there was no outgoing or incoming mail), but at that moment it ceased to matter.

There was no need for me to know; nothing could touch the strength of my love, my thoughts, and the image of my beloved.

Had I known then that my wife was dead, I think that I would still have given myself, undisturbed by that knowledge, to the contemplation of her image, and that my mental conversation with her would have been just as vivid and just as satisfying.”

Our Attitude Towards Suffering

A quote from the book says:

“If there is a meaning in life at all, then there must be a meaning in suffering. Suffering is an ineradicable part of life, even as fate and death. Without suffering and death, human life cannot be complete.”

To put it simply, one day you will die, and along the way, you are likely to suffer quite a bit.

While none of us will probably endure the intensity of suffering that the poor souls in the Nazi concentration camps had to endure, we will all have periods of suffering in one form or another.

As Frankl tells us, in these moments we are faced with a choice.

Suffering can either be a meaningful experience in our life, or we can let it turn into a bitter fight for self-preservation, forgetting our human dignity and becoming nothing more than an animal.

So what does it mean to “suffer well?”

Suffering well is an inner triumph. It was clear to every prisoner that life as they knew it was over. They were simply going to be worked to death in those camps, one way or another.

There was going to be no outward reward for “doing the right thing” for fellow prisoners. In fact, the only outward rewards were reserved for men who turned themselves into animals.

Those who were willing to beat their fellow prisoners were promoted to guards, which came along with larger food rations, more comfortable sleeping quarters and less demanding work.

But that didn’t stop some of the prisoners from choosing to suffer well. Frankl tells stories of some prisoners walking around comforting the other prisoners, sometimes giving the weakest among them their last pieces of bread.

Their response to their own suffering, and how they found meaning in that suffering, was to find ways to alleviate the suffering of others, even if it was just for a moment.

Which means that, even in the darkest of our experiences, we have a choice in how to respond.

This kinda ties perfect to my philosophy, “Your struggles and story aren’t for you. It’s for others!”

Some of my suffering like doing jail time, losing family members etc. ended up having more meaning than I thought and also has been able to help others.

Hope this served you.

Have you read this book yet? What’s your biggest takeaways from this post or the book itself? Let me know below.

What is your #1 goal right now?

If you’re looking to grow your current business, I have a free case study video that reveals The EXACT Process We Use To Help Clients Add An Extra 6-7 Figures To Their Business Revenue While Cutting Their Work Time In Half. Click here to check it out.

Be sure to check out other episodes, get more free content and learn more about me at  http://marquelrussell.com

Did This Help You? If so, I would greatly appreciate it if you commented below and share on Facebook

P.S: Wanna see a quick case study on how we helped a client attract more high paying clients, which helped her grow from $5k per month to $50k per month? If YES, you should click here.

Copyright 2018 – MARQUEL RUSSELL – All Rights Reserved